Auric: All about batteries

-

Batteries are really important if you're living off them

OK, so this is going to be pretty boring, but it is important so bear with me.

I learned from my experiments with the self-driving car that battery performance is critical, and to be honest last time I didn't pay enough attention.  I am making up for that oversight this time around.

The Lovbio car used a 6V lead-acid battery to run it's motor.  Because that didn't give me too much headroom for my 5V powered electronics I had to run a separate 7.4V LiPo pack (commonly known as a "2S" pack) to run the electronics.  While it worked in the short term and helped the car to meet it's goals, it was not a viable solution.

Because Auric is a ground-up design I had the opportunity to address a lot of the shortcomings from the last car and one of those was the power supply.  This time, it's a single battery and it's a big one, a 6200mAh 2S LiPo pack.  Basically it was the highest capacity 2S pack I could get my hands on.

I arrived at the 7.2V figure after some estimation.  The motors driving Auric's tracks are recommended for operation from 6V - 9V.  Each LiPo cell is typically 3.7V, so if I went to a 3S battery, I would have to regulate down from 10.9V which would have made things complicated.  But even then it wasn't that simple.  The NanoPC T4 processor board I am using needs 12V to operate.  I am not sure who thought this was a good idea because most comparable boards will operate from 5V - 6V.  To get around that I have to use a small switchmode power supply to provide the power for the processor.

But we are still not out of the woods yet.  Unlike SLA (Sealed Lead-Acid) or NiMH rechargeable cells, LiPo cells have a few other quirks we need to be aware of.  Firstly a fully-charge 2S package will measure well over 8V.  Mine measured 8.25V under load when I started testing.  The second thing is that they do not take kindly to being discharged below around 3V/cell, or 6V in my case.  I'm sure you've seen videos of burning battery packs which will clearly illustrate my point.

This means we are operating with a headroom of around 2.5V, and we need to be careful to shut things down before we get dangerously under voltage.  In a future version of the system software, Auric will manage it's own battery events, but I don't have time for that right now.  As a result, I needed to understand how long I could run the completed system before the battery voltage dropped to the critical point.

How are we going to measure this?  It's pretty simple actually, I dropped Auric onto the "RoboDyno" and let it run while measuring the terminal voltage of the LiPo pack every ten minutes.  My results are shown further down this page, and they highlight some interesting information.

If you plug "LiPo discharge curve" into your favourite search engine, you will find graphs a lot like this one:

You can see from these ideal values that there is a steep initial drop in voltage, followed by a long period of moderate drop and finally the point where the terminal voltage "drops off the cliff" and we really need to shut down.

 In my testing, the terminal voltage decline was quite linear, typically 40mV (0.04V) every ten minutes.  However if you plot the available headroom (as a percentage), the chart is much more dramatic.  My battery went from 40% (6.95V) to -10% (5.77V) in the 10 minute window!  Had I used a shorter sample window I would have gotten a more typical curve, but mine does at least follow the text book.

When I plugged in the charger it showed one cell bank at 3V, the other at 2.8V; so the inbuilt measurement is reasonably consistent.

 So what did I learn?  A few things actually:
  1. Auric can run safely for around two and a half hours across level terrain.  Hills and soft surfaces would affect this adversely.
  2. The battery cliff is very real
  3. The revised motion controller got to 40C, so I added a heatsink to the driver chip just to keep myself happy.  The datasheets say it can run to 50C, but why take chances?
  4. It takes 3 hours to get 3 hours worth of results.
In conclusion, I am writing this on the eve of what should be Auric's most epic voyage so far.  But at least now I am comfortable that it has the power to last the distance.  I just have to solve whatever other problems come up along the way.



Location: Sydney Olympic Park NSW 2127, Australia

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The QYT KT-7900D

-
Image
But is it any good? As you might have noticed, I am now a freshly licensed radio amateur .  As such I do need a transceiver or two in order to get on the air.  This is the story of one of my new radios. I have a limited discretionary budget to use for my new hobby, and I have to say from the outset that my lovely wife has been very supportive.  As such, I want to try and get the best value for our money.  One evening I stumbled upon this little item on Banggood for a little over $A150 including shipping.  Covering both 2m and 70cm bands with a claimed 20W output it seemed almost too good to be true.  I bought one. About ten days later a tiny package arrived for me.  At just 98mm x 43mm x 126mm the photos don't convey quite how small it actually is.  The entire case serves as a heatsink so it is heavier than it looks, but certainly not bulky. The standard power cable comes with a cigarette lighter plug.  As I intended to run it from home using a regulated PSU, I just cut the plug o
Read more

Life with Deep Racer - Part 2

-
Image
 An Update on AWS Deep Racer OK, so AWS Summit Sydney has been run and won.  Not by us however, but there are few interesting tidbits to report: The console is now widely available This is actually pretty big news, because: The console ties together Robomaker, SageMaker and everything else you need in a convenient package There are actual examples of functions included It seems to stay running now There is new firmware for the car Also important; this includes a rolling update for the Ubuntu base as well as the Deep Racer specific bits.  WiFi connection seems more reliable now as well. Our car has a new look Since my employer (Versent) was generous enough to send me to Re:Invent last year (where I got the Deep Racer), I thought it appropriate to deck it out in the company colours, and it was well-received at Summit last week.
Read more

DIY Self-Driving - Part 9 - New Imaging

-
Image
Please Note:    Unlike most of my projects which are fully complete before they are published, this project is as much a build diary as anything else.  Whilst I am attempting to clearly document the processes, this is not a step-by-step guide, and later articles may well contradict earlier instructions. If you decide you want to duplicate my build, please read through all the relevant articles before you start. We have a lot of work to do in pretty short space of time now, with new competitive opportunities in the very near future. To be honest, the line detection has simply not been good enough, and this is leading to some of the poor performance I have been experiencing with the car.  Whilst it really does work, it is not accurate enough.  There are a couple of issues here which need to be dealt with: The core processor is just not powerful enough; and The optics aren't good enough Processing As I noted in my "Next Iteration" article I am looking at othe
Read more